Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 4.3 points higher (39.4 vs 35.1) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $614; both premium class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Low).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 35.1 | −10.9% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 10.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $613.92 | −60.7% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 60.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.79s | 13.36s | +13.3% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 13.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 10.9% less intelligence, 60.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill