Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Max) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Max) scores 21.1 points higher (50.8 vs 29.7) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 29.7, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when 29.7 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.8 | 29.7 | −41.5% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 41.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,274.74 | $1,935.39 | −73.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 73.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 50.36s | 24.90s | −50.6% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 50.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Opus 5 (Max): 41.5% less intelligence, 73.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5 (Max)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill