Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) scores 0.6 points higher (30.1 vs 29.5) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($4925 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 29.5 | −2.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,924.80 | $2,277.12 | −53.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 53.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 104.36s | 16.63s | −84.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 84.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max): 2.0% less intelligence, 53.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill