Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback): 32.9% less intelligence, 216.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1744.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.9 | 24.1 | −32.9% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 32.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $482.13 | $1,524.02 | +216.1% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.91s | 109.01s | +1744.5% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 1744.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-low/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-low/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill