Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) scores 2.2 points higher (38.2 vs 36.0) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($6998 vs $1122; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.2 | 36.0 | −5.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 5.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,998.25 | $1,122.27 | −84.0% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 84.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 182.35s | 25.87s | −85.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 85.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Max): 5.8% less intelligence, 84.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill