DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)

DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.40
Total cost
$461
Z AIGLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.418.5+62.3% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 62.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$460.74Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)20.14s78.56s+290.1% GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is 290.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.00 / $4.00$0.55 / $2.20
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): what beats itGLM-4.6 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-4-6-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-4-6-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill