DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 81.6% more intelligence, 28.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 451.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 20.7 | +81.6% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 81.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $331.24 | −28.1% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 28.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.17s | 105.67s | +451.2% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 451.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill