DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 14.4 points higher (25.8 vs 11.4) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $461; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 25.8 | +126.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $992.88 | +115.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.20s | 46.75s | +131.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 131.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 126.3% more intelligence, 115.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 131.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill