DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) scores 2.1 points higher (11.4 vs 9.3) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($461 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 9.3 | −18.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 18.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $43.98 | −90.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 90.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.20s | 11.18s | −44.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 44.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 18.4% less intelligence, 90.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill