DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 11.4% less intelligence, 3.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 10.1 | −11.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 11.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $476.03 | +3.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 5.52s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill