DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 15.2 points higher (26.6 vs 11.4) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($737 vs $461; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Solar Pro 4 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 26.6 | +133.3% Solar Pro 4 is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $736.82 | +59.9% Solar Pro 4 is 59.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.16s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 133.3% more intelligence, 59.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Solar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill