DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 6.4 points higher (16.1 vs 9.7) but costs 41× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 16.1 | +66.0% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 66.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $822.85 | +4041.2% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 41× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.62s | 27.19s | +488.5% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 488.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 66.0% more intelligence, 4041.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 488.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V3 0324Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill