DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) scores 16.4 points higher (26.1 vs 9.7) but costs 75× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 26.1 | +169.1% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $1,486.78 | +7382.5% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 75× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.96s | 63.24s | +1175.0% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 1175.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $1.28 / $4.07 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 169.1% more intelligence, 7382.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1175.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 0324GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/glm-5-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/glm-5-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill