DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 32.1 points higher (41.8 vs 9.7) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3-Flash when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | GLM-5.3-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 41.8 | +330.9% GLM-5.3-Flash is 4.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $305.52 | +1437.6% GLM-5.3-Flash is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.62s | 38.89s | +741.8% GLM-5.3-Flash is 741.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.15 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GLM-5.3-Flash vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 330.9% more intelligence, 1437.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 741.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V3 0324GLM-5.3-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill