DeepSeek V3 0324 vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5 scores 12.1 points higher (21.8 vs 9.7) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($61.9 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.5 when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 21.8 | +124.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $61.93 | +211.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.62s | 46.61s | +908.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 908.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 124.7% more intelligence, 211.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 908.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
DeepSeek V3 0324MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill