DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max)

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
33.70
Total cost
$2097
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.2 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.733.7+146.0% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 2.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,097.29— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.55s30.10s+359.5% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 359.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.56 / $1.68$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill