DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 46.6 points higher (55.1 vs 8.5) but costs 123× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $25.4; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 55.1 | +548.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 6.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $3,117.31 | +12187.4% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 123× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.23s | 46.53s | +354.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 354.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 548.2% more intelligence, 12187.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 354.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill