DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 16.7 points higher (25.2 vs 8.5) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $25.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 25.2 | +196.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $427.73 | +1586.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 17× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 44.78s | +276.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 276.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 196.5% more intelligence, 1586.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 276.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill