DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 6.4% less intelligence, 266.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 42.2 | −6.4% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 6.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $1,630.69 | +266.8% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.55s | 11.28s | −22.5% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 22.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill