DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 14.8 points higher (45.1 vs 30.3) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $319; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Beam 1.0.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 30.3 | −32.8% Beam 1.0 is 32.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $318.73 | −28.3% Beam 1.0 is 28.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.71s | 7.79s | −47.0% Beam 1.0 is 47.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 32.8% less intelligence, 28.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 47.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill