DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 37.3 points higher (45.1 vs 7.8) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 7.8 | −82.7% Solar Pro 3 is 82.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $159.22 | −64.2% Solar Pro 3 is 64.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.97s | 18.88s | +18.2% Solar Pro 3 is 18.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 82.7% less intelligence, 64.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill