DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 9.6 points higher (34.3 vs 24.7) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 24.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when 24.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 34.3 | +38.9% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 38.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $1,012.50 | +323.8% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.72s | 31.07s | +1042.3% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 1042.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 38.9% more intelligence, 323.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1042.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill