DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 27.1 points higher (51.8 vs 24.7) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when 24.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 51.8 | +109.7% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $1,081.55 | +352.7% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 4.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.61s | 220.48s | +8347.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 8347.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 109.7% more intelligence, 352.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8347.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill