DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 17.4 points higher (42.1 vs 24.7) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $239; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 42.1 | +70.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 70.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $250.48 | +4.8% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 4.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.61s | 12.52s | +379.7% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 379.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 70.4% more intelligence, 4.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 379.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill