DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 23.4 points higher (48.1 vs 24.7) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $227; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when 24.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 48.1 | +94.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 94.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $227.10 | $909.01 | +300.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.01s | 83.46s | +2672.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 2672.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 94.7% more intelligence, 300.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2672.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill