DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 19.2 points higher (43.9 vs 24.7) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $227; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 43.9 | +77.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 77.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $227.10 | $238.53 | +5.0% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 5.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.95s | 11.16s | +278.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 278.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 77.7% more intelligence, 5.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 278.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill