DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 17.5 points higher (42.2 vs 24.7) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 24.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when 24.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 42.2 | +70.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 70.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $1,630.69 | +582.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.74s | 12.90s | +370.8% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 370.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 70.9% more intelligence, 582.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 370.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill