DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 1.1 points higher (25.8 vs 24.7) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 24.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when 24.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 25.8 | +4.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 4.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $992.88 | +315.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.61s | 46.75s | +1691.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 1691.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 4.5% more intelligence, 315.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1691.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill