DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 53.4% more intelligence, 54.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1797.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 37.9 | +53.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 53.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $109.55 | −54.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 54.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.61s | 49.53s | +1797.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1797.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill