DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)
Ring-2.6-1T vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 32.8% less intelligence, 140.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 783.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 16.6 | −32.8% Ring-2.6-1T is 32.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $575.60 | +140.9% Ring-2.6-1T is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.72s | 24.04s | +783.8% Ring-2.6-1T is 783.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill