DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 6.3 points higher (45.8 vs 39.5) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $672; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 45.8 | +15.9% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 15.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $1,536.78 | +128.7% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 12.36s | −19.6% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 19.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 15.9% more intelligence, 128.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill