DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 34.7% less intelligence, 47.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 213.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 25.8 | −34.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 34.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $992.88 | +47.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 47.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.92s | 46.75s | +213.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 213.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill