DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 9.0% less intelligence, 201.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 22.2 | −9.0% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 9.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $365.63 | +201.7% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 9.09s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gemini-3-5-flash-lite · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gemini-3-5-flash-lite?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill