DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 22.1 points higher (46.3 vs 24.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $149; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 46.3 | +91.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 91.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $206.66 | +38.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 38.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 116.79s | 48.29s | −58.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 58.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 91.3% more intelligence, 38.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill