DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 25.9 points higher (34.8 vs 8.9) but costs 74× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $14.7; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 8.9 | −74.4% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 74.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $14.68 | −98.6% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 98.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 57.75s | +275.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 275.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 74.4% less intelligence, 98.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 275.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill