DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 16.3 points higher (34.8 vs 18.5) but costs 56× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $19.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 18.5 | −46.8% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 46.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $19.16 | −98.2% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 98.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.46s | 5.09s | −67.1% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 67.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 46.8% less intelligence, 98.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill