DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Grok 4.3 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 9.9 points higher (34.8 vs 24.9) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $363; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (High).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Grok 4.3 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 24.9 | −28.4% Grok 4.3 (High) is 28.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $363.24 | −66.4% Grok 4.3 (High) is 66.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 27.84s | +74.5% Grok 4.3 (High) is 74.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 28.4% less intelligence, 66.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Grok 4.3 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill