DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 5.6 points higher (34.8 vs 29.2) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $538; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M3.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 29.2 | −16.1% MiniMax-M3 is 16.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $537.98 | −50.3% MiniMax-M3 is 50.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 25.47s | +59.7% MiniMax-M3 is 59.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 16.1% less intelligence, 50.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill