DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 53.1% less intelligence, 312.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 16.1 | −53.1% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 53.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $822.85 | +312.2% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.91s | 27.13s | +51.5% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 51.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill