DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 7.8 points higher (42.1 vs 34.3) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $200; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 42.1 | +22.7% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 22.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $250.48 | +25.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 25.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.12s | 12.25s | −32.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 32.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 22.7% more intelligence, 25.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill