DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) scores 12.8 points higher (34.3 vs 21.5) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($200 vs $10.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 21.5 | −37.3% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 37.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $10.63 | −94.7% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 94.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.12s | 6.75s | −62.7% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 62.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 37.3% less intelligence, 94.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)GPT-6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill