DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 24.2% less intelligence, 15.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 181.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 26.0 | −24.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 24.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $231.08 | +15.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 15.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 49.58s | +181.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 181.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill