DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 5.3 points higher (39.6 vs 34.3) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $200; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 34.3, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 39.6 | +15.5% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 15.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $1,385.40 | +594.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 6.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.63s | 20.85s | +18.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 18.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 15.5% more intelligence, 594.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill