DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max): 73.2% less intelligence, 102.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 9.2 | −73.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $199.63 | $405.10 | +102.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.94s | 6.20s | −65.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 65.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill