DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort): 47.6% less intelligence, 232.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.3 | 21.1 | −47.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 47.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $74.31 | $247.26 | +232.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.11s | 6.61s | −89.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 89.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill