DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max … scores 30.5 points higher (51.8 vs 21.3) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($323 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max … when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.8 | 21.3 | −58.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 58.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $323.26 | $250.18 | −22.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 22.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.39s | 4.97s | −80.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort): 58.9% less intelligence, 22.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill