DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 3.3 points higher (33.7 vs 30.4) but costs 7.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $277; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when you need intelligence above 30.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when 30.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.4 | 33.7 | +10.9% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 10.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.30 | $2,097.29 | +656.3% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 7.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.90s | 29.78s | −39.1% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 39.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
GLM-5.2 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max): 10.9% more intelligence, 656.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)GLM-5.2 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0424/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill