DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Muse Ember (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 185.7% more intelligence, 84.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.6 | 36.0 | +185.7% Muse Ember (Max) is 2.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $771.03 | $117.12 | −84.8% Muse Ember (Max) is 84.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.11s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill