DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 32.0 points higher (52.4 vs 20.4) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $451; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 20.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 20.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 52.4 | +156.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $5,786.78 | +1183.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.85s | 40.70s | +494.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 494.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 156.9% more intelligence, 1183.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 494.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill