DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 48.5% more intelligence, 29.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 30.3 | +48.5% Beam 1.0 is 48.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $450.76 | $318.73 | −29.3% Beam 1.0 is 29.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.81s | 8.02s | +17.8% Beam 1.0 is 17.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill